Planning Application Decisions

Planning Application Decisions

All applications can be found on the SDNPA website by typing in the reference. Please note that the SDNPA is the Local Planning Authority so if you wish to search for planning applications and find out more information then please use the above link.

Reference: SDNP/24/00928/HRA

Address: Downland, The Street, Bury, Pulborough, West Sussex, RH20 1PF

Proposal: Habitats Regulation 77 of the Habitats and Species Regulations (HRA, Habitats Regulations Assessment) – Installation of solar panels on the roof

BPC Decision: No objection

LPA Decision:

Reference: SDNP/24/00253/FUL

Address: Land North of Junction With B2138, Bury Road, Bury, West Sussex

Proposal: Construction of 1 no. underground dwelling

BPC Decision: The Parish Council supports this resubmission and reiterates its previous comments from application SDNP/22/05725/FUL (see below) . However, this support comes from the Parish Council as a whole and not from a single individual. The Council would be grateful, therefore, if any reference in the Planning Application Statement to a particular councillor is removed.

Comments on application SDNP/22/05725/FUL

The Council supports this application and believes the innovative design is worthy of approval under Paragraph 80 (e) of the NPPF. It has the potential to show outstanding and innovative architectural merit and, with its ground hugging form, it would have minimal impact on its immediate setting and on the surrounding area. Bury Parish Council welcomes this proposal as it would give certainty to the use of the site and prevent future unauthorised use which has blighted this land in the past. The Council is also very supportive of its ecological potential in which several renewable technologies are proposed to make a selfsufficient development. Should planning permission be granted for this proposal, BPC would wish any approval to be subject to the following conditions.

(a) A full geological survey to be undertaken to demonstrate the feasibilty of the proposal.

(b) A clear strategy on the management of spoil.

(c) The height of the new construction should not be any higher than that shown on the drawings.

(d) The developers enter into legal agreement that only this scheme and no other can be built on the plot of land if approval is given.

LPA Decision:

Reference: SDNP/23/05071/TCA

Address: Leghorn Cottage, The Street, RH20 1PA

Proposal: Notification to fell 1 multi-stem Aspen tree

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: No objection

Reference: SDNP/24/00197/FUL

Address: Sandy Meadow Farm

Proposal: Change use of land with 5 pitch settled gypsy accommodation site including landscaping and biodiversity enhancements

BPC Decision: Object:

The site is within the National Park an area of exceptional beauty and one of its principal aims is to conserve and enhance the natural landscape. Therefore, any development proposal must be made with that in mind. This proposal would do the opposite. It will detract from the enjoyment and intrude on the tranquillity of Lord’s Piece and the surrounding area much loved by walkers and horse riders and will therefore cause harm to a well-established part of the unique National Park landscape. It is far from any existing settlement, in a national dark sky reserve and could not be described as anything other than remote, out of character and harmful to a typical rural lane in the National Park. Its remoteness means that it is far from local amenities and, without access to local public transport, it will be completely car dependent and make no contribution to an existing settlement. The site is also subject to 2 outstanding planning refusals, namely SDNP/16/03121/FUL retention of mobile home and SDNP/23/01781/FUL retention of replacement barn.

Additionally, this development will require a major upgrade to the existing water, waste, and electricity utilities.

This is not a planning application that should be supported and BPC would therefore lodge its objection.

LPA Decision:

Reference: SDNP/24/00066/LIS

Address: Hatchets, West Burton Road, West Burton, Pulborough, West Sussex, RH20 1HD

Proposal: Repair of existing roof covering

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: Approved

Reference: SDNP/24/00262/TCA

Address: 5 Squires Cottages, The Street, Bury, West Sussex, RH20 1PA

Proposal: Notification of intention to fell 1 no. Walnut Tree (T1).

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: No objection

Reference: SDNP/24/00038/LIS

Address: Ferry Cottage, Church Lane

Proposal: Replacement windows and external doors, internal thermal upgrading to the existing summer house, and the installation of roof mounted solar thermal panels

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: 

Reference: SDNP/24/00021/TCA

Address:High Dyke, Church Lane, Bury, Pulborough, West Sussex, RH20 1PB

Proposal: Notification of intention to prune by up to 4m on 1 no. multi-stemmed Eucalyptus tree.

BPC Decision: Neutral

Reference: SDNP/23/04877/DCOND

Address: Bury Mill Farm

Proposal: Discharge of Conditions 10 (revised scheme of soft landscape works) and 17 (details of hard landscape works) of planning permission SDNP/13/01164/FUL.

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA decision:

Reference: SDNP/23/04403/LIS

Address:Westburton House West Burton Road West Burton Pulborough West Sussex RH20 1HD

Proposal: Installation of a stannah stairlift

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: Approved

Reference: SDNP/23/03878/HOUS

Address: Grevatts Hale Hill West Burton Pulborough West Sussex RH20 1HE

Proposal: Proposed traditional oak framed extension to existing outbuilding

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: Approved

Reference: SDNP/23/04331/TCA

Address:New Barn House The Street Bury West Sussex RH20 1PA

Proposal: Notification of intention height and width (all round) reduce by up to 1.5m on 1 no. Yew dome tree (marked as T2). Height reduce by 5m on 3 no. Leylandi tree (marked as G2).

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: No objection

Reference: SDNP/23/04485/TPO

Address: New Barn House The Street Bury Pulborough West Sussex RH20 1PA

Proposal: Width reduce the southern sector (over the road) by up to 2m and width reduce the northern sector by up to 1.5m on 1 no. Walnut Tree (T1) subject to 98/00121/TPO

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: Approved

Reference: SDNP/23/04342/TCA

Address: The Farmhouse The Street Bury Pulborough West Sussex RH20 1PA

Proposal: Notification of intention to crown raise by 4m by removing 3 no. lower branches on northern & southern sectors on 2 no. Ash trees. Fell 1 no. Elm tree. Remove 3 no.lowest branches over border up to 3m on eastern and western sectors on 1 no.Walnut tree. Remove 1 no. lowest branch on western sector and 3 smaller branches (above lowest branch) on 1 no. Copper beech tree.

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: No objection

Reference: SDNP/23/03797/TCA

Address:The Berries The Street Bury Pulborough West Sussex RH20 1PF

Proposal: Notification of intention to height reduce up to 2.5m on 1 no. Yew hedge (G1). Fell 5 no. multi stemmed Laurel border trees (G2). Remove 130 no. branches and stems to leave up to 3m on 1 no. Lapsed beech hedge (G3).

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: No objection

Reference: SDNP/23/03340/HOUS

Address: Little Meadow The Street Bury West Sussex RH20 1PA

Proposal: 2-storey front extension and raising the roof line

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: Approved

Reference: SDNP/23/03797/TCA

Address: The Berries The Street Bury Pulborough West Sussex RH20 1PF

Proposal: Notification of intention to height reduce up to 2.5m on 1 no. Yew hedge (G1). Fell no. Laurel border trees (G2). Remove  no. ascending stems and  no. lateral branches to leave up to 3m on 1 no. Lapsed beech hedge (G3)

BPC Decision: Withdrawn

Reference: SDNP/23/03685/HOUS

Address: Foxbury Farm West Burton Lane Bury Pulborough West Sussex RH20 1HB

Proposal: First floor extension to thatched roof with the addition of 2 no. dormer windows.

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: Approved

Reference: SDNP/23/03538/24BC

Address: Cokes Farm West Burton Road West Burton Pulborough West Sussex RH20 1HD

Proposal: Notification to extend use of campsite by an extra 30 days from 05.08.2023 to 01.10.2023

BPC Decision: The Council noted this application but had no comment.

LPA Decision:

Reference: SDNP/23/03390/TCA

Address: Lower House Farm West Burton Road West Burton Pulborough West Sussex RH20 1HD

Proposal: Notification of intention to fell 1 no. Beech tree (T1)

BPC Decision: Support

LPA Decision: No objection

Reference: SDNP/23/03044/LDE

Address: Sandy Meadow Farm Bignor Park Road Bignor West Sussex RH20 1HQ

Proposal: Use of land as a camping and caravan site

BPC Decision:  The Parish Council objects to this application and believes the evidence provided in support is incorrect as many parishioners have confirmed that over a period in excess of 10 years camping activity has been very intermittent, with none at all in some years. One of the main reasons for this is that the site is not always accessible in winter months. Furthermore there is a danger that should consent be granted an application for occupation by a warden of one of the illegal mobile homes currently on site will soon follow.

LPA Decision: Refused

Reference: SDNP/23/02630/FUL

Address: Stane Lodge Bury Gate Bury West Sussex RH20 1HA

Proposal: Demolition and rebuild of existing house and garage. Resubmission of application SDNP/21/04688/FUL.

BPC Decision: The Parish Council voted to remain neutral on this application on the condition that the agent’s rebuttal (please see below) to the Council’s objection to the original application (SDNP/21/04688/FUL) is correct and the SDNPA is happy with it.

Agent rebuttal:
‘Whilst the reference to the general terms of the NPPF are noted, I am not aware of any Development Plan policies which require the specific retention of buildings in these circumstances. In any event, the dwelling is in an extremely poor state of repair and given the subsidence and general state of the building it’s retention would not be warranted in this case, particularly given that it has been effectively written off by insurers and the mortgage company in 1990 (as noted within SDNP/15/01953/FUL). The situation has only deteriorated further since the last application.
It is also relevant to note that the dwelling is of nonstandard construction comprising of clay plots on the ground floor and 4×2 studding at 1st floor making refurbishment on the existing footings problematic in the extreme and economically unviable. Any refurbishment that did take place would not likely meet the high standards of environmental and energy performance now required and which could be achieved by a replacement dwelling’.

LPA Decision: Approved

Reference: SDNP/23/02268/HOUS

Address: Newoods Farm Bignor Park Road Bignor West Sussex RH20 1HQ

Proposal: Proposed alterations and extension including conversion of existing dairy barn to ancillary accommodation, a new orangery, outside swimming pool and shepherds hut and replace existing stables with cart barn.

BPC Decision: Support

LPA Decision: 

Reference: SDNP/23/01781/FUL

Address: Sandy Meadow Farm Bignor Park Road Bignor West Sussex RH20 1HQ

Proposal: Retention of replacement barn (retrospective).

BPC Decision: The Parish Council objects to this application for retrospective planning permission for a replacement barn on the grounds that it is twice the size of its predecessor. The proposed barn being approximately 24x12mx8m in height, as opposed to the previous barn which the plan of the site on the SDNPA planning portal shows to have been approximately 12x6m, which also accords with the recollection of many local residents.

The Council further rejects the contention that a barn of this size is required to store hay from a land holding with in our estimation no more than 5 acres of grassland. Using the applicant’s own figures the hay yield would be no more than 255m3 perhaps 300m3 at most this is less than 25% of the new barn’s internal area. Therefore, the Council believes this application contravenes SD4 (landscape character) and BNDP 2 (built character) as the proposed size and density of the barn is disproportionate to the plot resulting in a detrimental impact on the character of the surrounding landscape.

LPA Decision: Refused

Reference: SDNP/23/02040/FUL

Address: Whiteways Cafe Bury Hill Houghton West Sussex BN18 9FD

Proposal:Temporary siting of modified shipping container (incorporating PV panels to roof) and associated decking area for a period of five years to create pop-up sales space for Fauna Brewing. Landscaping including creation of downland species meadows, improved hedgerow incorporating hedge trees, and erection of fence to create wildlife buffer area around adjacent woodland.

BPC Decision: Though this application falls outside the parish boundary, Bury Parish Council (BPC) nevertheless feels that it is within the landscape context of the application and wishes to comment.

The application is for a temporary permission to test a business model with the minimum of investment. BPC has no objection in principle to the diversification of the food offer – particularly to walkers and cyclists – but, as a permanent structure, it does have some reservations. Should approval be granted, BPC recommends that it should be with the following conditions.

1. That the approval is strictly for a limited period and that no extension will be granted without greater consideration being given to the landscape and architectural impact of the proposal.

2. This application and any future application should strictly adhere to the commitment not to install any external lighting and to close the facility at dusk in order not to cause any deterioration to the dark sky environment.

LPA Decision: Withdrawn

Reference: SDNP/23/02478/HOUS & SDNP/23/02479/LIS

Address: Saddlers Church Lane Bury West Sussex RH20 1PB

Proposal: Two storey extension to the east elevation and alterations to the fenestration on the south east corner

BPC Decision: Support

LPA Decision: Approved

Reference: SDNP/23/02385/CND

Address: Jolyons The Street Bury Pulborough West Sussex RH20 1PF

Proposal: Side extension to west elevation – (variation of Conditions 1 and 2 of Planning Permission SDNP/20/00817/HOUS to add 1 no. ground floor window to north elevation and amend extension roof).

BPC Decision: Support

LPA Decision: Approved

Reference: SDNP/21/03372/FUL

Proposal: Change of use of land from agricultural to a mixed Class B2/Class B8 and equestrian use. Reclad and extend the existing barn to provide a bespoke joinery workshop, erection of a new stable block, installation of a horse walker and sand school and provision of ancillary parking, drainage and landscaping.

Address: Bignor Park Nursery Bignor Park Road Bignor RH20 1HG

BPC decision:  Objects to this planning application based on the reasons given in the dismissal of planning appeal SDNP/18/00105/REF which are contrary to BDNP policies 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 & 19 and SD policies 1, 4, 5 & 6 and strongly objects to the proposed change of use.

SDNPA decision: Application withdrawn

Reference: SDNP/23/01196/TCA

Address: St Johns Church, Church Lane

Proposal: Notification of intention to fell 1 no. Holly tree (T1), crown lift to 2.5m (above ground level) all round on 1 no. Holly tree (T2) and reduce southern sector to provide up to 2m clearance from the roof on 1 no. Yew tree (T3).

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: No objection

Reference: SDNP/22/05725/FUL

Address: Land North of Junction With B2138 Bury Road

Proposal: Construction of 1 no. underground dwelling.

BPC Decision: The Council supports this application and believes the innovative design is worthy of approval under Paragraph 80 (e) of the NPPF. It has the potential to show outstanding and innovative architectural merit and, with its ground hugging form, it would have minimal impact on its immediate setting and on the surrounding area. Bury Parish Council welcomes this proposal as it would give certainty to the use of the site and prevent future unauthorised use which has blighted this land in the past.  The Council is also very supportive of its ecological potential in which several renewable technologies are proposed to make a self-sufficient development. Should planning permission be granted for this proposal, BPC would wish any approval to be subject to the following conditions.

(a)    A full geological survey to be undertaken to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposal.

(b)    A clear strategy on the management of spoil.

(c)    The height of the new construction should not be any higher than that shown on the drawings.

(d)    The developers enter into legal agreement that only this scheme and no other can be built on the plot of land if approval is given.

LPA Decision: Refused

Reference: SDNP/23/01202/FUL

Address: Hillside Nursery Bury Common Bury West Sussex RH20 1NR

Proposal: Demolition of existing glasshouses and associated horticultural structures and erection of 7 no. C3 residential dwellings and 7 no. commercial workspace suites (class E(g)), including access landscaping and associated works at Hillside Nursery Bury Common Bury RH20 1NR (Amendments to plans, elevations and materials as approved under reference SDNP/21/05619/FUL).

BPC Decision: The Council objects to this application and is disappointed it has been submitted. The Parish Council spent a considerable amount of time with the developers to ensure the already approved scheme reflected and contributed to the character of the parish. However, the richness of materials expressing a natural hierarchy of buildings, set out in application SDNP/21/05619/FUL, which gave the impression of being built over time and which is in keeping with character and appearance of Bury has been lost and replaced with a single uniform material – red brick. The current scheme now offers what seems to be a much more standard form of housing development which has little appreciable relationship to the character of Bury and therefore contravenes BNDP 2 (Built Character), BNDP 13 (Landscape and Character) and SD4 (Landscape Character) and SD5 (Design). In short, this second application is disappointing and falls very far short of the first.

LPA Decision: Withdrawn

Reference: SDNP/23/00713/SCREEN

Address:  Sewage Treatment Works Houghton Lane Bury West Sussex

Proposal: EIA Screening Opinion Request for the proposed upgrade of wastewater treatment works.

BPC Decision: Support

LPA Decision:

Reference: SDNP/22/05630/CND

Address: Leawood Farm, The Coach House West Burton Lane Bury West Sussex RH20 1HB

Proposal: Relocation of a residential access and driveway – Variation of Condition 2 of planning permission SDNP/20/02659/FUL – access alignment amendments.

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: Approved

Reference: SDNP/22/05683/TCA

Address: Smiths Barn Church Lane Bury West Sussex RH20 1PB

Proposal: Notification of intention to height reduce by up to 4m (back to previous pollard points) on 1 no. Eucalyptus tree

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: No objection

Reference: SDNP/22/05635/TCA

Address: Leghorn Cottage The Street Bury West Sussex RH20 1PA

Proposal: Notification of intention to fell 1 no. Maple tree

BPC Decision: Neutral

LPA Decision: No objection

Reference: SDNP/22/05649/FUL

Address: Land at Timberley Farm Bury Common Bury West Sussex RH20 1NP

Proposal: Conversion of barn complex into dwelling with associated parking

BPC Decision: Neutral on the condition that any light spillage was reduced as much as possible in order to comply with policies SD8 and BNDP 15 and protect Bury’s Dark Night Skies. The Council generally supported the application and welcomed the designer’s approach to Energy and Ecosystems Sustainability, but had the following reservations with respect to light pollution. The Design and Access Statement does consider this issue at some length and the requirements of Local Plan policy SD8 that requires a developer to ensure that any proposed lighting was necessary and to reduce light spillage as a result of poor design. Furthermore, the statement noted that the proposed roof lights could be fitted with electrically operated dusk-dawn internal blackout blinds if required.

As there are 11 number proposed roof lights, the Council questioned whether the designer had truly tried to limit the roof lights to those that were absolutely necessary and indeed given that Timberley Farm was at the centre of an International Dark Night Sky Reserve should there be any roof lights at all. The Council also added that it did not consider the fact that a roof light was existing exempts it from the principles of light spillage reduction as required by policy SD8 which seemed to be implied in the D&A statement Secondly, it was proposed to replace 2 full height barn doors and infills with large glazed panels. Again, the Council questioned whether the amount of glazing was necessary as they were nearly 5 metres in height. And had light spillage mitigation been considered beyond manually operated blinds.

LPA Decision: 

Reference: SDNP/21/05619/FUL

Address: Hillside Nursery, Bury Common Bury RH20 1NR

Proposal: Demolition of existing glasshouse and associated horticultural structures and erection of 7 no. C3 residential dwellings and 7 no. commercial workspace suites (class E(g)), including access landscaping and associated works

BPC Decision: Object- Bury Parish Council (BPC) has monitored the progress of this application with great interest. If approved, it will be by far the largest development in the village for some time and the effect of such a substantial development needs to be fully considered. There are arguments for the development and arguments against and BPC is aware of the considerable tensions that the prospect of the development is causing to its neighbours and in particular to the owners of Southview Farm. Those clearly articulated objections are that the proximity of the new residential development to the farm may affect its 24/7 operation and that parking on the shared access road may compromise access to the fields. The objectors argue there is no case for any development within the village on the west side of the A29. Equally, there is an argument that suggests it could be a positive move for such a development to happen as a village on both sides of the road would promote the sense of the A29 being less of a ‘higher speed’ by-pass and more of a ‘lower speed’ road that passes through a community.
In an ideal world, BPC would have wished the Hillside Nursery would continue as a viable business. This, sadly, is not the case, and its owners are faced with the problem (or the opportunity) of what to do with a derelict site. There are those who would wish to see it returned to a field and agricultural use and, if this was remotely realistic, such a plan would no doubt receive BPC’s full support. The reality, however, is that the buildings exist and there is a legitimate case to be made for an alternative use. BPC is confident that the planning authority will have carried out all the relevant checks on marketing the site in its existing condition and use. It is also confident that it will have precedents to refer to in considering the condition to be imposed to deal with the potentially abrasive issues of a new residential development adjacent to an existing farm. Though BPC supports any negotiations that help protect the operational disciplines of Southview Farm, its position in relation to this application assumes that a change of use is likely to be granted. Its concern is therefore on the quality of the development rather than whether or not it should happen at all.

Given that context, BPC has looked carefully at the design proposal and welcomes it as an imaginative re-use of the disused nursery. The direction is very clear. It is well thought through and it has the potential to be a scheme that is well suited to its site, appropriate in its density and a worthy extension of the village. The careful site analysis led to the discovery of the earlier field pattern that provoked a natural division in the site between a more commercial front and the residential back. In terms of character, the drawings of the long barn with its sloping gutter and integrated route to the parking yard, show a promising and familiar response to the presence of the main road. Similarly, the compositional reference to a farmstead shows a sensitive approach to the view from the coffin trail and the characterisation of the yard at the rear of the site, with buildings of varying significance and scale, should set this proposal apart from the more suburban developments all too commonly seen over the last few years.
In considering the accommodation, BPC welcomes the variety of house types and the inclusion of smaller and more affordable cottages. It does, however, have some concerns about the amount of E class accommodation proposed and would like reassurance that there is indeed a market for this space as the units at Carringdales, the development close to Bury Gate and also off the A29, may not yet be fully let. BPC is also concerned about the amount of parking required for these commercial units. It seems like a large car park that, on the face of it, looks like too many cars. Equally, it would not wish to see the development have too few, particularly if that meant that cars were parked in the street. BPC would wish to see the evidence that supports the numbers proposed.
In terms of the process, BPC has found the pre-app discussions positive and is pleased to have had its voice heard. This proposal represents a step change from the one seen a year ago and it is a credit to the developer that such a strong change direction was countenanced in favour of a more sensitively considered approach. That said, though BPC had hoped it could support the design content of the full application, it has three serious reservations that prevent it from doing so.
The commercial barn roof
The earlier sketches shown to BPC in the pre-app process (which copiously illustrate the Design and Access Statement) show the commercial barn divided into two parts under a single long roof. This image gave a bold and convincing impression of a single large barn which, very disappointingly, has not been carried through to the submitted design. Instead of two parts of a single building united under one roof, there are now two distinct, smaller buildings revealing blank gable walls separated by a very large gate. It is the main part of the composition seen from the A29 and, with this change, the proposal now lacks both the confidence and conviction of the previous idea. The continuity of the form is made to depend on this rather feeble and unresolved gate which has all the charm of an industrial estate. Though it may be open most of the time, its message is more of a ‘keep out’ signal rather than the more welcoming gesture of the continuous roof. This change is a serious disappointment and, in the view of BPC, undermines one of the key ideas in the proposal.
The residential car barns
Similarly, the character of the ‘farmstead’ yard has taken a backward step from the earlier sketches. The Design and Access Statement shows small, pitched roof structures adjacent to and attached to the houses around the yard. These have now been substituted by flat roofed car ports. The original composition of an informal group of different types of buildings was completed and held together by these smaller scale pitched roof structures which gave a spatial and characterful continuity. The new flat-roofed structures take the grouping back to a 60’s cul-de-sac or the very suburban character that this design sought to avoid. This is not a point that should be considered as too subtle or unimportant as the picturesque proposition on which the design is based is dependent on that picture being complete.
The car parking for the cottages
With the car parking largely screened or hidden, the parking strategy seems generally successful. It is a pity therefore that the four parking spaces for the cottages closest to the front of the development is so obvious. It seems the discipline of sight lines is driving the layout all to be below the eye level of a driver making the presence of the cars all too visible These four cars will be clearly seen in the foreground of the layered view so valued in the design and will form the first impression approaching the residential yard. It is the one point where the general layout remains unconvincing.
BPC is disappointed that these three aspects of the design have left the earlier promise of well-considered proposal short of a scheme that it could support and, as long as they remain unresolved, BPC objects to the application on design grounds. BPC believes these are matters that are easily fixed and very much hopes the issues will be properly addressed during the application process. If that were possible, BPC would look forward to rescinding its objection and, instead, be in a position to support the application as, in principle, it is in favour of a positive development replacing the disused Hillside Nursery.
In the event of the application being approved, BPC would like to see three conditions imposed on the approval. First, a commitment from the applicant that there will be no additional parking on the street and that a management plan is proposed to bring this into effect is included as a formal part of this application. Second, that further details of the fencing and perimeter landscaping are submitted for approval and that BPC will be allowed to comment on them. And third, the proposed details of the fenestration of the commercial barn’s street elevation are submitted for scrutiny by BPC and agreed prior to an approval.

LPA Decision: Approved 

Reference:SDNP/22/05117/HOUS

Address: 5 Squires Cottages, The Street

Proposal:,Single storey front extension to existing dining area, alterations and extension to existing
side porch

BPC Decision: Neutral on the condition that the roof light was fitted with an automated blind and the amount of glazing on the proposed extension was reduced by 50% in order to comply with policies SD8 and BNDP 15 and protect Bury’s Dark Night Skies.

LPA Decision: Approved